Well the question is this; how can we say something with so much  evidence cannot outright exist. I have been watching a lot of  documentaries on YouTube recently and am fascinated by the evidence  gathered.
The Discovery Channel broadcast a show (the link to  which I will provide) which states that "There are over 400 credible  Bigfoot sightings a year" [1]. This is merely the start of a documentary  which really cements the credibility of an unknown species of North  American ape.
Looking first of all at footprints, and  particularly at the distribution of footprint size, two experts have  come up with some interesting conclusions. One, a man who works for a  CSI team who examine the fingerprints and other skin detail of the  footprint plaster casts concluded that they were genuine, non-human and  unlike any ape he has ever examined. Bare in mind that if you watch the  whole documentary, you will learn that he has examined plenty in his  time.[2]
The second expert looked at the difference in footprint  sizes, hoping to find either a staggered and random set of results  (indicating a fake) or a bell-curve (which indicates a natural graph of a  living species). He found the footprint sizes documented made a very  decent bell curve. [2]
Then we must take into acount the  Patterson-Gimlin Film [3] which, after numerous experts examined it,  seems to have a very high chance of being authentic. There is apparent  muscle movemtn beneath the skin and fur, the right thigh appears to be  carrying what some experts describe as a hernia!
Also as, the  expert describes, the bigfoot in the film is clearly female as it has a  pair of very distinct breasts; why would Patterson construct an already  difficult, if not impossible suit with breasts when Bigfoot reports have  been predominantly male? [4]
Everything from the gait, the  proportions and the aesthetic of creature apparently points to it being  of natural origins and non-synthetic. Why, then, should it be so hard to  believe that Bigfoot really DO exist? I'll leave you to watch the  evidence as gathered in the below bibliography and make up your own  minds about whether it is likely that North America is, indeed, home to  the legendary Sasquatch.
[1] Documentary,  Part 1 of 5
[2]Documentary,  Part 5 of 5
[3]The Patterson-Gimlin Film
[4]Analysing the Patterson-Gimlin Film
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment